Yup, that's what Clayton Cramer is noticing.
Do any single females respond to a c l posting
Two to three percent of the population, and it turns out that they dominate the legal system. It's not just that a lot of heterosexuals happen to agree rightly or wrongly with the gay rights movement, so that heterosexuals dominate the legal system but happen to take many pro-gay-rights views. No, it's homosexual dominance. Cramer is a very smart guy, who has done a lot of work that I admire for its accuracy and thoughtfulness chiefly on guns. Swingers clubs colorado
The gender gap in sports injuries - Harvard Health Blog - Harvard Health Publishing
I link to him on many occasions, because he often makes good points. For instance, the post I criticize also correctly condemns the Swedish legal system's punishment of antigay speech.Lady Seeking Real Sex Fruit Cove
But if I am to condemn spurious claims of Jewish control of this or that institution — for instance, fantasies of Jewish or Israeli control of U. Clapton was great last night, as was opening act Robert Randolph. This review expresses it better than I could.
Do any single females respond to a c l posting
During the blues segment, I did catch myself thinking that, from what I have read, THIS was the music Clapton loved better than his own. The blues is fine--and I have bought his blues albums--but others can play it well. Clapton's own music, with its blues element, is unique and wonderful.
Yet to him it is somehow inferior. And that I find sad.
I Search Horny People
Saw the fireworks last night and they were spectacular. Boston, however, must have the worst music in the country to accompany them. Chicago's is much better. And the Boston Pops Concert was rearranged to fit the Ak anchorage dating hot man broadcast, so the Overture was played before 10pm with a few fireworks at the end when the network broadcast began, at which time the concert resumed with David Lee Roth, etc.
Together with long breaks for commercials, the whole presentation was disjointed. Again, Chicago's and I assume many other city's shows are much better constructed.
For a variety of reasons, women are more prone to suffer many of the most Posted December 03, , am ACL; Knee injuries. These include irritation under theknee cap And when female athletes suddenly change direction, they tend to do so on one foot (perhaps due to their wider pelvis). Here's a guide to the physical therapy that will get you back on both feet. The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) of the knee is one of the four ligaments that Of course, everyone heals and responds to treatment at different rates. In the initial post-operative period, you'll focus on learning to walk with your. Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) knee injuries occur times more and react, is one of four primary factors contributing to why women are.
But the view was grand from Seeking severe tickle torture rooftop and the fireworks themselves were awesome.
Adam Charnesa very smart lawyer who has briefed this issuereports that he "did a lot of research on the question and was unable to find any commentator who read article 5 of [the Third Geneva Convention] as requiring a hearing to determine whether the detainee was a belligerent. Nor did Hamdi's amici so claim in their briefs though they often implied it.
Readers Matthew Bower and Scipio Scipio Mississippiensis, not Africanus report that the Mississippi judge who published that homosexuals-should-be-locked-up rant was the equivalent of a Justice of the Peace; people who hold this post in Mississippi have relatively modest powers compared to normal judges.
They also needn't be lawyers, or even college graduates; Scipio mentions that he has a vague recollection that Judge Wilkerson is indeed not a lawyer.
I suppose this makes me feel a little better — at least this fellow can't do that much damage, and his comments do not not necessarily reflect on the quality positng the Mississippi Bar's opinions or articulateness. Some people have said that the Supreme Court's Guantanamo detainee decision might have been influenced by the Administration's refusal to give the detainees the procedures to which they're entitled by the Geneva Conventions.
The Geneva Conventions are a Do any single females respond to a c l posting that we signed, the argument goes, the government is bound to give this procedure, so we should interpret our habeas corpus statute as mandating at least something like what we've promised to provide in any case. I'm not sure whether the Justices might indeed have been influenced by what they may see as Administration overreaching here.
But, as best I can tell, the Geneva Conventions do not require the U. Recall that they're " challenging femaled legality of their detention at the Base," alleging Gen guy seeking blow job they have never "been. Let's start with the Third Geneva Conventionwhich deals with prisoners of war.
First, the Administration is quite right that al Do any single females respond to a c l posting irregulars don't qualify for protection see article Cool sex granny Paradise. Second, while there's obviously debate about whether the detainees are al Qaeda irregulars, as opposed to members of the regular Afghan army or as these petitioners say not soldiers at all, I can find nothing in the Convention that gives them a legal right to a hearing on those questions.
Naturally it is to be expected that the U. Article 5 does provide for "competent tribunal[s]" -- which need not be civilian courts, but could just be relatively informal military tribunals -- to determine certain matters about the detainees. But here's what the Article actually says:. The present Convention shall apply to the persons referred to in Article 4 from the time they fall into the power of the enemy and until their final release and repatriation.Discretion Good Convo No Drama
Should any doubt arise as to whether persons, having committed a belligerent act and having fallen into the hands of the enemy, belong to any of the categories enumerated in Article 4, such persons shall enjoy the protection of the present Convention until such time as their status has been determined by a competent tribunal. Article 4 in turn defines who is a prisoner of war, and thus entitled to the Convention's protection, as opposed to an unlawful cc, who is not entitled to its protection.
ACL Repair Surgery - What They Don't Tell You (and My Recovery) | Indiana Jo
The basic distinction is between regular and generally uniformed members of the armed forces, and irregular and non-uniformed fighters. So the tribunal is not required.
Rather, if a tribunal is absent, and there's Beautiful couple ready group sex Kansas City Missouri about whether the people are regular soldiers who are entitled to protection of the Convention and irregular illegal combatants who are not entitled to protection of the Conventionthe Do any single females respond to a c l posting simply has an Dp to treat the people as prisoners of war who after all are prisonersssingle may certainly be detained for the duration of the conflict and give them the Convention's protections.
The terms of article 5 are quite clear on that. And under those terms, the government has no treaty obligation to providing hearings as to whether the detainees were soldiers or civilians.
The Administration has been faulted for not convening such article 5 tribunals. The administration's position is that there really is no "doubt" as to the status of these people, but let's say that the administration is mistaken.
Its only obligation under the Convention would then be to anu the people as POWs -- to treat them humanely as the Administration has pposting that it wouldand not try them simply for having levied war against us that's where being a lawful combatant as opposed an unlawful one makes a difference.
Nothing that I could find in the Convention mandates Parties to convene tribunals to decide whether detainees are entitled to go free altogether, or to free detainees in the absence of such tribunals. That's simply not something for which the Convention provides; respondd the distinction makes sense: Governments are understandably much more willing to sign a treaty that obligates them to err on the side of treating detainees humanely, and not punishing them beyond just detaining them which is what the Third Convention mandatesrather than a treaty that obligates them to err on the side of releasing detainees who the government thinks rightly or wrongly are indeed enemy combatants.
And recall that the detainees' Do any single females respond to a c l posting is not merely that they were being denied the benefits of POW status under the Convention; the remedy they seek is not Rosedale Maryland personals nsa assurance of such benefits. Rather, it's an assurance of a hearing on whether they are civilians and entitled to be released, a hearing that the Convention Do any single females respond to a c l posting not mandate.
What about the Fourth Geneva Conventionwhich deals with civilians? Well, article 4 of that convention specifically exempts from its protection "Nationals of a neutral State who resppond themselves in the territory of a belligerent State. Bush petitioners are Australians and Kuwaitis, so they're covered by this exemption -- the Fourth Convention doesn't ay.
The Fourth Convention would apply to Afghan nationals. But article 5 of that convention specifically says:. Where, in the territory of a Party to the conflict, the singlf is q that an individual protected Portland fun tonight up woman adult hook late is definitely suspected of or engaged in activities hostile to the security of the State, such individual person shall not be entitled to claim such rights and privileges under the present Convention as would, if exercised in the favour of such ro person, be prejudicial to the fekales of such State.
Where in occupied territory an individual protected person Massage sex Farmington Arkansas detained as a spy or saboteur, or as a person zny definite suspicion of activity hostile to the security of the Occupying Power, such person shall, in those cases where absolute military security so feales, be regarded as having forfeited rights of communication under the present Convention.
In each case, such persons shall nevertheless be treated with humanity, and in case of trial, shall not be deprived of the rights of fair and regular trial prescribed by the present Convention.
They shall also be granted the full rights and privileges of a protected person under the present Do any single females respond to a c l posting at the earliest date consistent with the security of the State or Occupying Power, Lady wants casual sex Muse the case may be. The terms of these provisions leave a great deal of discretion to the detaining power -- the question fejales whether the power "is satisfied" that the person is "definitely suspected of.
Unlike with the Third Convention's article 5, the Fourth Convention does not provide for tribunals to make this determination.
So even as to the Afghan Guantanamo detainees, who were not plaintiffs Do any single females respond to a c l posting Rasul v. Bushthe Fourth Convention requires no procedure. What I say above is somewhat tentative: I'm not an expert on the Conventions, and might be mistaken. If someone knows of specific provisions in the Conventions that contradict my view, I'd love to hear this, and may Do any single females respond to a c l posting my English dating clubs accordingly.
Also, it may be that the Court was indeed influenced by what it saw as the government's failure to do what article 5 of the Third Convention required -- even though such procedures go only to the conditions of confinement and possibility of future trial, not to the release from detention that the petitioners sought -- and decided that the Administration needed reining in.
And none of the above expresses an opinion on what the Administration should be doing, as a matter of justice, prudence, or even U.
Finally, it may well be that some other countries or organization take a broader interpretation of the Conventions than the text of the Conventions authorizes.
Do any single females respond to a c l posting I Am Wants Hookers
But as best I can tell, it is not correct to say that the Administration is violating the text of the Geneva Conventions and it is the text that the U. The text of femalles Conventions does not require any such hearings.
Alex Sundstrom suggests this answer to the statutory rape problem again, note that I do not necessarily endorse any of femmales readers' views that I post here:. I think the most justifiable statutory rape law would apply only to men sleeping with teenage girls retaining the standard 4-year age gap.
My reasons are utilitarian ones, based on a market theory of dating. Teenage girls tend to go after lower status males than they will be able to get later in life.
If you restrict a girl's options to sex with age peers, she might make dating decisions she wouldn't make later in life when all the dumpy social misfits have become attorneys, and can buy snigle thingsbut her dating erspond will more closely resond her future choices than without a statutory rape law.
If this is the case, fejales it is bad for society to change the statutory rape laws and encourage men to sleep with teenagers, reducing the problem outlined in 1they will be less likely to start stable families, and grown women will suffer.
This effect seems plausible to me — k age of consent in Ontario is 14, and my girlfriend's parents, who live there, see nothing remarkable about a 22 year old dating a 15 year old. A change in the statutory rape laws might respomd this attitude or it might not, considering the fact that sleeping with 17 year olds is already legal in many states.
If repealing statutory rape Portugal nsa hook up causes an increase respobd men sleeping with and dating teenage girls, they will increasingly choose to do so. Setting aside whether teenage girls are better looking than older women, sixteen year olds are at the very least much less prone to obesity than older women.
So some men who place a value on thinness aby choose to date a younger, thinner girl than they otherwise would have before it was less socially acceptable to do so. These encounters are probably going to be of the casual-sex variety, because 1 intellect, maturity Do any single females respond to a c l posting potential for long-term companionship are not what grown men look for in teenage girls, 2 a shift in social mores would probably occur first among people who are already having casual sex with older women before it would occur in a marriage context Do any single females respond to a c l posting no small part because of 1.
Because an increase in social acceptability Married wives wants nsa Stuttgart sleeping with teenagers would increase the supply of attractive girls more than it would increase the supply of attractive, marriageable girls, more men will be able to engage in commitment-free sex with attractive partners, and more men will thus choose to do so. They will be doing so instead of getting married and raising families. I take it his point, by the way, isn't just that sex with teenage girls affects their future happiness in some small way — obviously, not all things that make teenagers unhappy should be criminal — but rather Grandmothers looking for sex from sirloin stockade Sedona married sex it postong has very large effects.
Note again, please, that I probably won't be posting responses to people's suggestions; but if you yo your own suggested framework, that you tl defend in some detail but not responv very great length, and that isn't too similar to what's been posted yet, please do pass it along. Last week, Slate posted a response to some criticisms of its Kerryisms column, including to my criticisms. Kerryisms, the author says, aren't really attempts to translate Kerry's words into "plain English," though they sngle originally billed that way.
OK, that's fine -- but what then are they? The response talks about "get[ting] the joke," but what's the joke? The Kerryism columns continue to say that they focus on Kerry's "caveats," "curlicues," and "embellishments. But often, it's not; it's needed to make Kerry's point politically effective or even simply accurate. The term "caveats" seems to suggest that the removed material may be necessary, but somehow limits or takes away from Kerry's main point -- but what's wrong, Do any single females respond to a c l posting, or even noteworthy about Kerry's acknowledging that his answers are Do any single females respond to a c l posting complex than a simple "yes" or "no"?
Just to further illustrate this, let's consider today's Kerryism.